A Reply to Mendaglio and Tillier

Dublin Core

Title

A Reply to Mendaglio and Tillier

Description

When Dabrowski cast his theory in a series of formal statements (hypotheses), he was clear that the hypotheses were tentative and that new research findings will necessitate changes and revisions in the theory and its concepts. Mendaglio and Tillier see the theory as cast in stone and invariable: Dabrowski’s “choice of terms and their definitions cannot be a focus of criticism: after all, TPD is his theory.” Consequently, Mendaglio and Tillier blindly stand by even the most absurd, inadvertently erroneous statements that are contradicted by the whole theory.

Date

2015

Language

English

Source

Piechowski, M. M. (2015). A reply to Mendaglio and Tillier. Roeper Review, 37(4), 229-233.

Files

A Reply to Mendaglio and Tillier.pdf

Collection

Tags

Citation

“A Reply to Mendaglio and Tillier,” TPD Archive , accessed November 19, 2017, http://christianewells.com/items/show/38.

Document Viewer